Skip to article Metriq PRISM Laboratory Back to research
← All researchMF-PRISM-MATH-2026-05 / interactive guide

THE IDEA, MADE VISIBLE

When two fractured sets add up.

Add copies of the middle-third Cantor set and see why the wording of a problem matters.

Publication holdA Note on the Literal Formulation of Problem 13 for Fast Achievement-Set Sumsets
Explore the idea
When two fractured sets add up.The depth-3 2-fold outer sumset has 1 connected component. The publication’s interpretation remains on hold.CANTOR SUMSET / FORMULATION UNDER REVIEWOne copy CPUBLICATION HOLDA literal witness is not a stronger theorem.
Calculated illustration · change the inputs to inspect the mechanism.
01 / 04Guided chapter

Keep two thirds of the digits

The middle-third Cantor set uses only digits zero and two in base three. Every refinement removes more open intervals.

3
2
Summands
2
Sumset components
1
Covered length
2

The depth-3 2-fold outer sumset has 1 connected component. The publication’s interpretation remains on hold.

C + C = {x + y : x ∈ C, y ∈ C}

TRY THIS

Switch between one and two summands. Notice that adding sets is fundamentally different from overlaying their pictures.

What this experiment represents. Publication hold. This is a classical middle-third witness illustrating the formulation issue, not a new proof of the intended Problem 13.

Source manuscript & release ↗Read the full explanation ↓

MF-PRISM-MATH-2026-05 / v1.2

Publication hold

A Note on the Literal Formulation of Problem 13 for Fast Achievement-Set Sumsets

An interpretation note analyzing the literal formulation of Problem 13 and a middle-third witness. Publication remains on hold pending clarification of the source authors' intended formulation.

Publication remains on hold pending source-author clarification. This page preserves the record; it does not announce a resolved problem.

EditionVersion 1.2
Released18 July 2026
Reserved DOI10.5281/zenodo.21434602 Reserved · not published on Zenodo
Canonical record
01 Overview

The question, construction, and claim.

This page is an interactive guide to the preprint. The manuscript and source package remain the controlling research record.

PUBLICATION HOLD · SOURCE-AUTHOR CLARIFICATION REQUIRED. This interpretation note remains on publication hold pending clarification of the source authors' intended formulation of Problem 13. This edition succeeds historical identifier MF-MATH-2026-05, whose release remains preserved. Metriq PRISM Laboratory is the organizational creator; Daniel H. Jeffery is Research Director and corresponding contributor. Review the current files on GitHub ↗
QUESTION

Can the constant 3 in the condition 3ⁿrₙ → 0 be replaced by a smaller constant while preserving the stated sumset conclusion?

CONSTRUCTION

How the paper approaches it

Use the normalized middle-third sequence xₙ = 2/3ⁿ. Its tail is rₙ = 1/3ⁿ, so every replacement c < 3 satisfies cⁿrₙ → 0, yet the achievement set is the standard Cantor set.

WHY IT MATTERS

What the result would establish

The example isolates a sharp threshold using a classical object. The principal review issue is interpretive: whether the cited problem intended an additional hypothesis that excludes this boundary example.

CANDIDATE MAIN RESULT

For every fixed 0 < c < 3, the modified exponential condition holds, but E(x) + E(x) = [0,2]. Therefore the literal constant 3 cannot be lowered.

xₙ = 2/3ⁿ · rₙ = 1/3ⁿ · xₙ = 2rₙ
cⁿrₙ = (c/3)ⁿ → 0 for every c < 3
E(x) = C · C + C = [0,2]
Research status. This is a candidate result released for independent mathematical review. It is not peer reviewed, accepted, or presented as an established resolution. The source package identifies proof dependencies, verification limits, licensing, and review priorities.
02 Explorer

Work with the construction.

These interfaces reproduce finite structures and diagnostics described by the paper. They are explanatory tools, not substitutes for the infinite proofs.

INTERACTIVE EXPLORERTHE c = 3 THRESHOLD

Move the proposed replacement constant.

The upper plot tracks log₁₀((c/3)ⁿ). The lower display contrasts the sparse Cantor set with its full interval self-sum.

c / 3
Limit behavior
Current verdict

Modified exponential condition

Cantor set and its self-sum

03 Proof structure

How the argument is assembled.

The paper separates the claim into proof obligations that can be reviewed independently.

01

Tail identity

Compute the exact remainder rₙ = 3⁻ⁿ and verify the sequence is fast because xₙ = 2rₙ > rₙ.

02

Modified condition

For any proposed replacement c < 3, the expression cⁿrₙ equals (c/3)ⁿ and converges to zero.

03

Cantor identification

The subsums use ternary digits 0 and 2, so the achievement set is the standard middle-third Cantor set C.

04

Digit recombination

Every ternary digit 0, 1, or 2 splits into two binary digits. This gives every point of [0,2] as a sum of two points of C.

04 Verification

Exact checks and their limits.

Verification scripts test finite identities and consistency conditions. They do not replace the symbolic proofs of infinite statements.

WEBSITE VERIFICATION SNAPSHOTCurrent paper v1.2 · script lineage v1.0
Exact checks passed.
Main example: x_n=2/3^n, r_n=1/3^n, x_n=2r_n.
For every c<3, c^n r_n=(c/3)^n -> 0.
Ternary digits 0,1,2 cover every prefix; hence E(x)+E(x)=[0,2].
Generalization checked for m=2,...,8: x_n=m/(m+1)^n and mE=[0,m].
05 Figures

Formula-derived visuals.

The source package includes the scripts and files used to generate these figures.

The threshold behavior of (c/3)ⁿ below, at, and above c = 3.
The threshold behavior of (c/3)ⁿ below, at, and above c = 3.
The middle-third Cantor set and its interval self-sum.
The middle-third Cantor set and its interval self-sum.
The supplementary m-fold base-(m + 1) generalization.
The supplementary m-fold base-(m + 1) generalization.
06 Independent review

Where criticism is most valuable.

A useful review identifies the exact theorem, equation, inference, or prior-art issue involved and distinguishes fatal defects from repairable exposition.

REVIEW TARGET 01

Problem wording

Confirm the source article’s remainder convention and exact intended meaning of “smaller number.”

REVIEW TARGET 02

Hidden hypotheses

Determine whether an omitted restriction was intended to exclude geometric boundary examples.

REVIEW TARGET 03

Prior recognition

Search errata, correspondence, workshop notes, and later versions because the witness is classical and unusually short.

Research disclosure. The source package contains the paper-specific authorship, AI-assistance, licensing, and reproducibility disclosures. AI systems are not listed as authors; Metriq Foundation accepts responsibility for releasing the work as a candidate result.
07 Citation

Cite the version you reviewed.

State that the result was a candidate preprint and had not undergone peer review at the time of citation.

Metriq PRISM Laboratory. (2026). A Note on the Literal Formulation of Problem 13 for Fast Achievement-Set Sumsets (Version 1.2) [Candidate research preprint]. Metriq Foundation, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21434602

In this paper