Build the generating series
Package the lattice-walk counts into a formal power series so the whole sequence can be studied at once.
THE IDEA, MADE VISIBLE
Separate the constraints of a three-dimensional walk, then count their interleavings.
Coordinate a stays nonnegative and returns to zero. Coordinate c stays nonnegative but may end anywhere. Coordinate e is unrestricted.
The exact coordinate formula gives a6 = 3,911. Its recurrence residual is 0.
aₙ = Σ n!/(r!s!t!) · Aᵣ · Cₛ · 2ᵗ, with r+s+t=n
Set length to 4: the coordinate formula gives 188, and the recurrence residual is exactly zero.
What this experiment represents. The coordinate-count formula and recurrence follow MATH-2026-09. Counts in the displayed range are exact integers; the Bessel factorization and general proof are not re-proved here.
A recurrence proof with exact Ore-operator verification
A candidate proof of Mathar's conjectured recurrence for the Type-ace lattice-walk sequence OEIS A302186. Exact verification covers coefficients through n=100 and the Ore-operator identity.

The paper explains a conjectured lattice-walk recurrence by factoring the generating function into Bessel-function pieces and transferring that structure into an exact recurrence operator.
A recurrence predicts each term of a sequence from earlier terms. Mathar observed such a rule for a Type-ace lattice-walk sequence, but a numerical pattern is not yet an explanation.
This paper’s proposed explanation passes through special functions. It rewrites the walk-generating series using Bessel factors, derives the differential or operator relation they satisfy, and converts that relation back into the conjectured recurrence.
The paper’s technical details matter, but the basic route can be understood in three moves.
Package the lattice-walk counts into a formal power series so the whole sequence can be studied at once.
Express the series using Bessel-type components whose differential behavior is already structured.
Use an Ore-operator identity to convert the factorization into the claimed coefficient recurrence, then verify coefficients exactly through n = 100.
The conjectured recurrence is given a structural derivation rather than only a numerical fit.
The factorization, formal-series coefficients, and recurrence operator are checked exactly.
The manuscript targets OEIS A302186 and does not claim a recurrence theorem for unrelated lattice-walk models.
Candidate proof released for independent specialist and publication-priority review.
This manuscript presents a candidate resolution. Publication is not verification: independent specialist review remains necessary before the result should be treated as established.
Exact verification to a large finite order supports the proof but cannot replace review of the symbolic derivation.
The claim is specific to the Type-ace sequence and its stated generating function.
Novelty and publication priority remain separate from mathematical correctness.
A proof would replace a conjectured numerical pattern with a structural explanation tied to special functions and operator factorization.
These are the terms needed to understand the claim. The full paper uses them more precisely.
A walk whose steps follow allowed moves on a regular grid.
A formal series that stores an entire sequence in its coefficients.
A classical special function satisfying a structured differential equation.
An algebraic operator used to represent differential or recurrence relations exactly.
The strongest review is not a general reaction. It tests the steps most capable of changing the conclusion.
This page is a reading guide, not a substitute for the manuscript. The public record links the explanation to the paper, source package, review materials, and persistent identifier.