Metriq PRISM Laboratory — Program for Research in Intelligent Systems and Methods, a research laboratory of Metriq Foundation
Candidate preprintNot peer reviewedOpen source package

An Achievable Cantorval with Zero-Dimensional Boundary

A factorial mixed-radix construction presented as a candidate affirmative answer to whether an achievable Cantorval can have boundary of Hausdorff dimension zero.

IdentifierMF-MATH-2026-04
Version1.1
Released16 July 2026
CONTROLLING RESEARCH RECORDMF-MATH-2026-04 · Version 1.1 · MetriqOrg/PRISM
Open canonical folder ↗
Formula-derived cover artwork for An Achievable Cantorval with Zero-Dimensional Boundary
MF-MATH-2026-04v1.1
01 Overview

The question, construction, and claim.

This page is an interactive guide to the preprint. The manuscript and source package remain the controlling research record.

Canonical repository status. Internal proof audit found no mathematical correction required; independent specialist review and publication-priority review remain outstanding. Review the current files on GitHub ↗
QUESTION

Can an achievable Cantorval have a nonempty, uncountable boundary whose Hausdorff dimension is nevertheless zero?

CONSTRUCTION

How the paper approaches it

Use growing even bases bₙ = 2n + 2 and blocks containing one 3/Qₙ term and n copies of 2/Qₙ. Complete residues create interior while a three-state boundary recursion controls branching.

WHY IT MATTERS

What the result would establish

The proposed example separates topological complexity from metric size: the boundary remains a Cantor set but is dimensionally as thin as a nonempty set can be.

CANDIDATE MAIN RESULT

The proposed achievement set has nonempty interior and infinitely many gaps, while its boundary is covered at level N by at most 2·3ᴺ sets of diameter at most 2/(3Qᴺ), yielding dimension zero.

bₙ = 2n + 2 · Qₙ = 2ⁿ(n + 1)!
Bₙ = (3/Qₙ, 2/Qₙ repeated n times)
N-level boundary cover: 2·3ᴺ sets of diameter ≤ 2/(3Qᴺ)
Research status. This is a candidate result released for independent mathematical review. It is not peer reviewed, accepted, or presented as an established resolution. The source package identifies proof dependencies, verification limits, licensing, and review priorities.
02 Explorer

Work with the construction.

These interfaces reproduce finite structures and diagnostics described by the paper. They are explanatory tools, not substitutes for the infinite proofs.

INTERACTIVE EXPLORERFACTORIAL CONTRACTION

Watch branching lose to scale.

Finite mixed-radix prefixes produce the visible set. The dimension diagnostic compares at most 2·3ᴺ boundary branches with the factorial denominator Qₙ.

Prefix states Qₙ
Merged components
Outer tail
Dimension diagnostic
Cover count
Cover diameter

Mixed-radix outer approximation

Boundary cover diagnostic

03 Proof structure

How the argument is assembled.

The paper separates the claim into proof obligations that can be reviewed independently.

01

Central interval

The block digit set is a complete residue system modulo bₙ. Mixed-radix prefix control yields an explicit interval inside the achievement set.

02

Separated branches

An exact lower-branch recursion exhibits a gap at every level, producing infinitely many complementary components and the Cantorval topology.

03

Boundary recursion

Track lower, central, and upper boundary states. At most three descendants survive per level, so the branch count grows like 3ᴺ.

04

Factorial contraction

Geometric scale contracts as Qₙ = 2ⁿ(n + 1)!, which overwhelms exponential branching. Every positive-dimensional Hausdorff cover cost tends to zero.

04 Verification

Exact checks and their limits.

Verification scripts test finite identities and consistency conditions. They do not replace the symbolic proofs of infinite statements.

WEBSITE VERIFICATION SNAPSHOTCurrent paper v1.1 · script lineage v1.0
All finite structural and high-precision checks passed.

First blocks:
 n   b_n       Q_n    block numerators                    D_n
 1     4          4  (3,2)                               (0, 2, 3, 5)
 2     6         24  (3,2,2)                             (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7)
 3     8        192  (3,2,2,2)                           (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9)
 4    10       1920  (3,2,2,2,2)                         (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11)
 5    12      23040  (3,2,2,2,2,2)                       (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13)
 6    14     322560  (3,2,2,2,2,2,2)                     (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15)

Closed forms:
A_1 = 2*sqrt(e)-3 = 0.297442541400256
sum E = 4*sqrt(e)-5 = 1.594885082800513
central interval = [0.594885082800513, 1]

Finite outer-approximation component counts:
U_1: 3 = 3^1
U_2: 9 = 3^2
U_3: 27 = 3^3
U_4: 81 = 3^4
U_5: 243 = 3^5

Boundary cover diagnostics:
      n    log(2*3^n)/log(Q_n)    log10(s=0.1 cover cost)
      1         1.292481250360578              0.700336125345
      2         0.909478540072342              1.099642255027
      3         0.758723263512023              1.486454511047
      5         0.615850329442420              2.232778895882
     10         0.477996864743633              3.993487849488
     20         0.382582944603201              7.252951581663
     50         0.297346811580000             16.015269122565
    100         0.252598018043228             28.987813882235
    500         0.185552261719278            110.113923820290
  1,000         0.166254510903560            190.241168193062
 10,000         0.123378597880982            904.120540607596
100,000         0.098036254424357           -955.736154235187
05 Figures

Formula-derived visuals.

The source package includes the scripts and files used to generate these figures.

Finite outer approximations from the factorial mixed-radix construction.
Finite outer approximations from the factorial mixed-radix construction.
Boundary-cover geometry and the competition between branching and contraction.
Boundary-cover geometry and the competition between branching and contraction.
06 Independent review

Where criticism is most valuable.

A useful review identifies the exact theorem, equation, inference, or prior-art issue involved and distinguishes fatal defects from repairable exposition.

REVIEW TARGET 01

Boundary recursion

Check that every displayed child is boundary of the full set, that no extra overlap points are omitted, and that central endpoints are treated correctly.

REVIEW TARGET 02

Cover count

Verify the at-most 2·3ᴺ boundary cover and its diameter bound at every level.

REVIEW TARGET 03

Prior art and generalization

Search variable-base, nonstationary Moran, and mixed-radix constructions; review the broader even-base theorem separately.

Research disclosure. The source package contains the paper-specific authorship, AI-assistance, licensing, and reproducibility disclosures. AI systems are not listed as authors; Metriq Foundation accepts responsibility for releasing the work as a candidate result.
07 Citation

Cite the version you reviewed.

State that the result was a candidate preprint and had not undergone peer review at the time of citation.

Metriq PRISM Laboratory. (2026). An Achievable Cantorval with Zero-Dimensional Boundary (Version 1.1) [Candidate research preprint]. Metriq Foundation, Inc. https://github.com/MetriqOrg/PRISM/tree/main/Papers/MF-MATH-2026-04