Skip to article Metriq PRISM Laboratory Back to research
← All researchMF-PRISM-MATH-2026-03 / interactive guide

THE IDEA, MADE VISIBLE

Two thin parts. Every binary choice.

Split the positions of a binary prefix, then add the two independently chosen parts back together.

Candidate resolutionEvery Infinite Achievement Set Is a Sum of Two Achievement Sets of Hausdorff Dimension Zero
Explore the idea
Two thin parts. Every binary choice.A contributes 0.539063 and B contributes 0.125000. Together they give 0.664063 with no shared digit positions.COMPLEMENTARY POSITIONS1A0B1B0A1A0A1A0BAB
Calculated illustration · change the inputs to inspect the mechanism.
01 / 04Guided chapter

Start with binary choices

For this finite illustration, each position contributes either zero or a power of one half. The complete prefix has a regular grid of subset sums.

8
85
A positions
5
B positions
3
Reconstructed choices
256

A contributes 0.539063 and B contributes 0.125000. Together they give 0.664063 with no shared digit positions.

A + B = {a + b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B}

TRY THIS

Change the number of positions. A and B remain complementary even when one block contains many more positions.

What this experiment represents. Finite binary illustration of the decomposition mechanism. These finite sets do not certify the dimensions of the paper’s infinite components.

Source manuscript & release ↗Read the full explanation ↓

MF-PRISM-MATH-2026-03 / v1.4

Candidate preprint · Not peer reviewed

Every Infinite Achievement Set Is a Sum of Two Achievement Sets of Hausdorff Dimension Zero

A candidate proof that every achievement set generated by an absolutely convergent real series with infinitely many nonzero terms can be written as the Minkowski sum of two achievement sets of Hausdorff dimension zero.

EditionVersion 1.4
Released18 July 2026
Reserved DOI10.5281/zenodo.21434562 Reserved · not published on Zenodo
Canonical record
01 Overview

The question, construction, and claim.

This page is an interactive guide to the preprint. The manuscript and source package remain the controlling research record.

CANDIDATE PREPRINT · NOT PEER REVIEWED. Independent specialist review and publication-priority review remain outstanding. This edition succeeds historical identifier MF-MATH-2026-03, whose release remains preserved. Metriq PRISM Laboratory is the organizational creator; Daniel H. Jeffery is Research Director and corresponding contributor. Review the current files on GitHub ↗
QUESTION

Can every infinite achievement set be decomposed into two achievable sets, each having Hausdorff dimension zero?

CONSTRUCTION

How the paper approaches it

Partition the inherited nonzero sequence into alternating finite blocks. Extend each block until the untouched absolute tail is super-exponentially small relative to the prefix length of the opposite factor.

WHY IT MATTERS

What the result would establish

The candidate theorem would strengthen known zero-measure Cantor decompositions by forcing both factors to have the smallest possible nonempty Hausdorff dimension.

CANDIDATE MAIN RESULT

For a complementary partition A ⊔ B of the indices, E(a) = E(a|A) + E(a|B), while both factor achievement sets have Hausdorff dimension zero.

E(a) = E(a|A) + E(a|B)
dimₕ E(a|A) = dimₕ E(a|B) = 0
Explicit model: [0,1] = C_A + C_B
Research status. This is a candidate result released for independent mathematical review. It is not peer reviewed, accepted, or presented as an established resolution. The source package identifies proof dependencies, verification limits, licensing, and review priorities.
02 Explorer

Work with the construction.

These interfaces reproduce finite structures and diagnostics described by the paper. They are explanatory tools, not substitutes for the infinite proofs.

INTERACTIVE EXPLORERCOMPLEMENTARY BINARY BLOCKS

Split the binary digit positions.

The explicit model assigns factorial-length blocks alternately to A and B. Their individual prefix sets are sparse, but their Minkowski sum recovers every binary prefix.

A positions
B positions
A prefix states
B prefix states
Combined states
All binary prefixes

Finite prefix geometry

The dense bottom row reflects exact finite recombination. The dimension-zero conclusion depends on the infinite checkpoint construction in the manuscript.

03 Proof structure

How the argument is assembled.

The paper separates the claim into proof obligations that can be reviewed independently.

01

Prefix-tail cover

After m binary decisions, cover an achievement set by at most 2ᵐ translated tail sets whose diameters are controlled by the absolute remainder.

02

Alternating blocks

Construct complementary blocks so each factor encounters infinitely many checkpoints where its remaining tail is super-exponentially small relative to its prefix length.

03

Dimension zero

At the checkpoints, 2ᵐRₘˢ tends to zero for every s > 0, forcing zero Hausdorff dimension for both factors.

04

Exact recombination

Complementary binary selections recombine term-by-term under absolute convergence, proving the exact Minkowski-sum identity.

04 Verification

Exact checks and their limits.

Verification scripts test finite identities and consistency conditions. They do not replace the symbolic proofs of infinite statements.

WEBSITE VERIFICATION SNAPSHOTCurrent paper v1.4 · script lineage v1.2
FINITE BINARY RECOMBINATION
  factorial blocks checked: 1!, 2!, 3!
  digit positions: 1..9
  A positions: [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
  B positions: [2, 3]
  |C_A prefix| = 128
  |C_B prefix| = 4
  |C_A + C_B prefix| = 512 = 2^9
  attained numerators: 0..511 over denominator 2^9
  status: PASS

FACTORIAL CHECKPOINT RATIOS
  r | p_r | M_(2r)/p_r | q_r | M_(2r+1)/q_r
  --+-----+------------+-----+----------------
   1 |     1 |   3.000000 |     2 |       4.500000
   2 |     7 |   4.714286 |    26 |       5.884615
   3 |   127 |   6.874016 |   746 |       7.926273
   4 |  5167 |   8.947745 | 41066 |       9.962329
   5 | 368047 |  10.971188 | 3669866 |      11.977198
   6 | 40284847 |  12.981465 | 482671466 |      13.984620
   7 | 6267305647 |  14.987025 | 87660962666 |      15.988903
   8 | 1313941673647 |  16.990398 | 21010450850666 |      17.991609
   9 | 357001369769647 |  18.992604 | 6423384156578666 |      19.993431
  10 | 122002101778601647 |  20.994126 | 2439325392333218666 |      21.994716
  lower bounds used in the paper:
    M_(2r)/p_r >= r for r >= 2
    M_(2r+1)/q_r >= (2r+1)/2
  both checkpoint ratios diverge to infinity
  status: PASS

ADAPTIVE BLOCK CHECKPOINTS FOR a_n = 2^{-n}
  k=1: p_k=1, N_(2k)=2; q_k=1, N_(2k+1)=3
  k=2: p_k=2, N_(2k)=4; q_k=2, N_(2k+1)=5
  k=3: p_k=3, N_(2k)=9; q_k=6, N_(2k+1)=36
  k=4: p_k=30, N_(2k)=900; q_k=870, N_(2k+1)=756900
  every block is nonempty and both tail targets are met
  status: PASS

ALL EXACT-ARITHMETIC CHECKS PASSED
05 Figures

Formula-derived visuals.

The source package includes the scripts and files used to generate these figures.

Alternating factorial-length blocks assigned to the two factors.
Alternating factorial-length blocks assigned to the two factors.
Finite binary prefixes illustrating how two sparse factors recombine.
Finite binary prefixes illustrating how two sparse factors recombine.
06 Independent review

Where criticism is most valuable.

A useful review identifies the exact theorem, equation, inference, or prior-art issue involved and distinguishes fatal defects from repairable exposition.

REVIEW TARGET 01

Tail alignment

Audit the off-by-one placement of future A and B terms after each alternating block endpoint.

REVIEW TARGET 02

Dimension criterion

Confirm the prefix-tail cover convention, arbitrarily small scales, and the checkpoint Hausdorff-content estimate.

REVIEW TARGET 03

Interpretation and prior art

Check whether the source problem imposes additional decomposition conventions and search for equivalent sparse-partition lemmas.

Research disclosure. The source package contains the paper-specific authorship, AI-assistance, licensing, and reproducibility disclosures. AI systems are not listed as authors; Metriq Foundation accepts responsibility for releasing the work as a candidate result.
07 Citation

Cite the version you reviewed.

State that the result was a candidate preprint and had not undergone peer review at the time of citation.

Metriq PRISM Laboratory. (2026). Every Infinite Achievement Set Is a Sum of Two Achievement Sets of Hausdorff Dimension Zero (Version 1.4) [Candidate research preprint]. Metriq Foundation, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21434562

In this paper